?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Ner's Random Musings on a life of interesting insights

a world of interesting factoids about nothing and everything


August 12th, 2003

(no subject) @ 12:17 pm

 
Share  |  |

Comments

 
[User Picture Icon]
From:rangoon
Date:August 12th, 2003 08:15 pm (UTC)

Re: been there

(Link)
When you uninstall Trillian, it gives you a form to vent and explain why you are removing it from your system. I, of course, pointed to the accessibility issues. I'm sure my comments got lost in the oblivion of the scrapheap, but it was a valient effort to try anyway. If you're an engineer, I don't think you will like fields like social work. The humanities don't have the same level of precision that engineering does, nor are they built heuristically on any definite axioms like physics and chemistry. If you want to help people, you're probably better off resorting to a more exact science like Dianetics. And if you're interested in an academic discussion of Atheism vs. Christianity, you might be interested in "Atheism Vs. Christianity, Where does the Evidence Point: The great Debate." I found it to be very engaging, even though it didn't bring me to any definite conclusion concerning the matter.
[User Picture Icon]
From:lucid42day
Date:August 14th, 2003 09:12 am (UTC)

Re: been there

(Link)

Dianetics? LOL.

[User Picture Icon]
From:djner
Date:August 14th, 2003 09:47 am (UTC)

Re: been there

(Link)
Wow, I actually went to that web page just now. That is kind of funny. Sorry sam, but no, not interested in dianetics :).
[User Picture Icon]
From:rangoon
Date:August 19th, 2003 12:22 pm (UTC)

Re: been there

(Link)
Which web page did you go to? Both of them, or the one I cited, or the one Joe cited? If only one, how did you decide which one to read? J/C
[User Picture Icon]
From:djner
Date:August 19th, 2003 12:41 pm (UTC)

Re: been there

(Link)
I went to the one that joe sited, not yours. I'll look at yours at some point today.
[User Picture Icon]
From:rangoon
Date:August 19th, 2003 12:11 pm (UTC)

Re: been there

(Link)
It is clear to me that you obviously have not ever tried to apply the procedures of Dianetics, otherwise you would be aware that Dianetics works and that these sites are clearly intended for the purpose of attacking L. Ron Hubbard and the Church of Scientology. The author has obviously misunderstood the concepts of auditing and their purpose. Much of the imperical evidence sought by the author is provided in the book referenced in the link I provided in a previous post. You can rely on others for the truth and take their word for it, or you can find it out for yourself. The choice is yours.

Ner's Random Musings on a life of interesting insights

a world of interesting factoids about nothing and everything